
2 of 2
The position accuracy that may be achieved by this method will be dependent on many factors:
average satellite geometry, sky visibility at antenna location, satellite health, time of day, etc..
The following graph summarizes the results of several examples of position averaging over
different time periods. The intent is to provide an idea of the relationship between averaging
time and position accuracy. All experiments were performed using a single frequency receiver
with an ideal antenna location.
WARNING: This graph represents typical results using the GPSolution position averaging routine.
This function is useful for obtaining the WGS-84 position of a point to a reasonable accuracy
without having to implement differential GPS. It is interesting to note that even a six hour
occupation can improve single point GPS accuracy from over fifty meters to better than five
meters. This improved accuracy is primarily due to the elimination of the multi-path error in the
GPS signal.
Again, it is necessary to keep in mind that the resulting standard deviations of the position
averaging can vary quite a bit, especially over relatively short averaging times. To illustrate, the
position averaging function was run for a period of one hour at three different times during the
day. The resulting standard deviation in latitude varied from 4.7 to 7.0 meters. Similarly, the
variation in longtitude and height were 4.9 to 6.7 meters and 10.9 to 12.5 meters respectively.
This degree of variation is common for averaging periods of less than 12 hours due to changes in
the satellite constellation. The graph, however, should at least provide some indication of the
accuracy one may expect from single point position averaging.
Single Point Averaging
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
0 4 8 12 16 20 24 28 32 36 40 44 48
Time (hours)
Standard Deviation (meters)
Latitude Longtitude Height